The Dawson Ledger

Work / Civilization / Data cards / Southeast Asian/Maritime Demographic Structure 800-1500 CE

Data card

Southeast Asian/Maritime Demographic Structure 800-1500 CE

Demographic structure data (age structure, life expectancy, fertility, mortality) for Southeast Asian/Maritime civilization during medieval period (800-1500 CE), showing balanced structure with high fertility and high mortality.

Data Summary

  • Age Structure (800 CE): ~37% under 15, ~58% 15-64, ~5% 65+ (balanced, high youth proportion)
  • Age Structure (1500 CE): ~37% under 15, ~58% 15-64, ~5% 65+ (balanced, high youth proportion)
  • Life Expectancy (800 CE): ~30-35 years at birth
  • Life Expectancy (1500 CE): ~31-36 years at birth
  • Fertility Rate (800 CE): ~5-6 births per woman
  • Fertility Rate (1500 CE): ~5-6 births per woman
  • Mortality Rate (800 CE): ~34-39 deaths per 1,000 population
  • Mortality Rate (1500 CE): ~33-38 deaths per 1,000 population
  • Trend: Stable demographic structure with high fertility and high mortality, slight improvement
  • Confidence: Weak (very limited historical records, primarily archaeological estimates)
  • Source: McEvedy & Jones 1978, expert assessments, archaeological skeletal analysis
  • Period: 800-1500 CE (Medieval period, Srivijaya, Angkor, regional kingdoms)

Time Series Data

Year Age <15 (%) Age 15-64 (%) Age 65+ (%) Life Expectancy (years) Fertility (births/woman) Mortality (deaths/1,000) Notes
800 37 58 5 30-35 5-6 34-39 Srivijaya, growth begins
1000 37 58 5 31-36 5-6 33-38 Srivijaya peak, Angkor growth
1200 37 58 5 31-36 5-6 33-38 Regional kingdoms, continued growth
1500 37 58 5 31-36 5-6 33-38 Port polities, continued growth

Age Distribution

  • Youth (0-14): 37% of population (high youth proportion, balanced structure)
  • Working Age (15-64): 58% of population (moderate-high, supports economic capacity)
  • Elderly (65+): 5% of population (low, typical for pre-modern civilizations)

Age Structure Implications

  • Military Capacity: High youth proportion (37%) provides military recruitment pool (Guns axis)
  • Economic Capacity: Moderate-high working age (58%) supports economic productivity and specialization
  • Dependency Ratio: Moderate dependency (youth + elderly = 42%), manageable
  • Population Growth: High fertility (5-6 births/woman) with high mortality (33-39 deaths/1,000) enables moderate population growth

Life Expectancy Trends

  • 800 CE: 30-35 years at birth (moderate for pre-modern civilization)
  • 1500 CE: 31-36 years at birth (moderate, slight improvement)
  • Trend: Slight improvement (maritime trade integration, agricultural productivity, disease management)

Life Expectancy Implications

  • Health Status: Moderate life expectancy indicates moderate disease burden
  • Economic Capacity: Moderate life expectancy limits economic productivity per capita but enables population growth
  • Disease Vulnerability: Moderate life expectancy indicates moderate disease burden (Germs axis)

Fertility Trends

  • 800 CE: 5-6 births per woman (high fertility, typical for pre-modern civilizations)
  • 1500 CE: 5-6 births per woman (high fertility, stable)
  • Trend: Stable high fertility (cultural preferences, agricultural economy, high infant mortality)

Fertility Implications

  • Population Growth: High fertility enables population growth despite high mortality
  • Age Structure: High fertility creates high youth proportion (37%)
  • Economic Impact: High fertility creates dependency but also future labor force

Mortality Trends

  • 800 CE: 34-39 deaths per 1,000 population (high mortality, typical for pre-modern civilizations)
  • 1500 CE: 33-38 deaths per 1,000 population (high mortality, slight improvement)
  • Trend: Slight improvement (maritime trade integration, disease management, agricultural productivity)

Mortality Implications

  • Disease Burden: High mortality indicates significant disease burden (Germs axis)
  • Infant Mortality: High infant mortality (estimated 200-300 per 1,000 live births) contributes to high overall mortality
  • Life Expectancy: High mortality limits life expectancy (30-36 years)
  • Population Growth: High mortality constrains population growth despite high fertility

Comparative Context

  • Age Structure Comparison:
    • Similar to other pre-modern civilizations (high youth, low elderly)
    • Similar to Sinitic (1500 CE: 37% vs 38% under 15)
    • Balanced structure supports economic and military capacity
  • Life Expectancy Comparison:
    • Similar to other pre-modern civilizations (31-36 years)
    • Similar to Sinitic (1500 CE: 31-36 vs 32-37 years)
    • Moderate for pre-modern standards
  • Fertility Comparison:
    • Similar to other pre-modern civilizations (5-6 births/woman)
    • Similar to Sinitic (1500 CE: 5-6 vs 5-6 births/woman)
    • High fertility enables population growth
  • Mortality Comparison:
    • Similar to other pre-modern civilizations (33-39 deaths/1,000)
    • Similar to Sinitic (1500 CE: 33-38 vs 32-38 deaths/1,000)
    • High mortality constrains population growth

Key Events

  • 800-1000 CE: Srivijaya expansion period - Demographic structure balanced (36-37% under 15, 5% 65+), life expectancy 30-34 years, fertility 5-6 births/woman

  • 1000-1200 CE: Srivijaya peak and Majapahit expansion - Demographic structure balanced (36-37% under 15, 5% 65+), life expectancy 30-34 years, continued development

  • 1200-1400 CE: Majapahit expansion period - Demographic structure balanced (36-37% under 15, 5% 65+), life expectancy 30-34 years, trade network integration

  • 1400-1500 CE: Melaka expansion period - Demographic structure balanced (36-37% under 15, 5% 65+), life expectancy 30-34 years, port polity coordination

  • 1511 CE: Portuguese conquest of Melaka → portuguese conquest melaka 1511ce - Melaka fall, demographic disruption (post-period)

  • Event-data integration: Demographic structure (36-37% under 15, 5% 65+, life expectancy 30-34 years, high mortality 33-39 deaths/1,000) reflects Srivijaya expansion (800-1000 CE), Majapahit expansion (1200-1400 CE), and Melaka expansion (1400-1500 CE), with maritime trade integration affecting disease transmission

  • Demographic Transitions: No demographic transition during this period; stable high fertility and high mortality

  • Regional Variation: Core regions (mainland, maritime) may have different demographic structure than periphery

  • Urban vs. Rural: Urban populations (port cities) may have different demographic structure (higher mortality in cities) than rural populations

  • Disease Impact: High mortality (33-39 deaths/1,000) indicates significant disease burden; maritime trade integration may affect disease transmission

  • Maritime Trade Effects: Maritime trade network integration may affect disease transmission (Germs axis)

  • Data needs: More detailed age structure data (5-year age groups), infant mortality rates, cause-specific mortality, regional demographic variation

Population Under 15† (percent, )

  • Some values are estimates (interpolated or inferred); each carries a method and confidence in the table (hover the ~).
Data table (4 points)
YearValueSource
800~37UNATTRIBUTED in public archive
1000~37UNATTRIBUTED in public archive
1200~37UNATTRIBUTED in public archive
1500~37UNATTRIBUTED in public archive

Population 15-64† (percent, )

  • Some values are estimates (interpolated or inferred); each carries a method and confidence in the table (hover the ~).
Data table (4 points)
YearValueSource
800~58UNATTRIBUTED in public archive
1000~58UNATTRIBUTED in public archive
1200~58UNATTRIBUTED in public archive
1500~58UNATTRIBUTED in public archive

Population Over 65† (percent, )

  • Some values are estimates (interpolated or inferred); each carries a method and confidence in the table (hover the ~).
Data table (4 points)
YearValueSource
800~5UNATTRIBUTED in public archive
1000~5UNATTRIBUTED in public archive
1200~5UNATTRIBUTED in public archive
1500~5UNATTRIBUTED in public archive

Life Expectancy† (years, )

  • Some values are estimates (interpolated or inferred); each carries a method and confidence in the table (hover the ~).
Data table (4 points)
YearValueSource
800~32.5UNATTRIBUTED in public archive
1000~33.5UNATTRIBUTED in public archive
1200~33.5UNATTRIBUTED in public archive
1500~33.5UNATTRIBUTED in public archive

Fertility Rate† (births_per_woman, )

  • Some values are estimates (interpolated or inferred); each carries a method and confidence in the table (hover the ~).
Data table (4 points)
YearValueSource
800~5.5UNATTRIBUTED in public archive
1000~5.5UNATTRIBUTED in public archive
1200~5.5UNATTRIBUTED in public archive
1500~5.5UNATTRIBUTED in public archive

Mortality Rate† (per_1000, )

  • Some values are estimates (interpolated or inferred); each carries a method and confidence in the table (hover the ~).
Data table (4 points)
YearValueSource
800~36.5UNATTRIBUTED in public archive
1000~35.5UNATTRIBUTED in public archive
1200~35.5UNATTRIBUTED in public archive
1500~35.5UNATTRIBUTED in public archive
About this entry

A draft entry preserved from civilization.study. Evidence grade: weak. 2 of 2 listed sources are fully documented; the rest are names only. † marks figures that are scholarly estimates. Method and sources

Methodology Notes

  • Estimation method:
    • Archaeological skeletal analysis provides age structure and mortality evidence
    • Demographic models (stable population models, life tables) estimate life expectancy and fertility
    • Expert assessments (scholarly consensus) for periods with very limited data
    • Cross-validation using population growth rates and age structure models
  • Data quality: Weak (very limited historical records, primarily archaeological estimates)
  • Uncertainty range:
    • Age structure: ±8-12% (very limited historical records, regional variation)
    • Life expectancy: ±4-6 years (archaeological evidence, demographic models)
    • Fertility: ±0.8-1.2 births/woman (demographic models, expert assessments)
    • Mortality: ±4-6 deaths/1,000 (archaeological evidence, demographic models)
  • Limitations:
    • Very limited historical records
    • Archaeological skeletal analysis limited to burial sites, may not represent full population
    • Regional variation within Southeast Asian/Maritime civilization not fully captured (mainland vs. maritime)
    • Urban vs. rural demographic differences uncertain
    • Infant mortality data very limited
  • Cross-validation:
    • Population growth rates (fertility - mortality = growth)
    • Age structure models (stable population models)
    • Archaeological evidence (skeletal analysis, burial patterns)

Integration with Corpus

Notes

  • Demographic Structure: Balanced age structure with high youth proportion (37%) and low elderly (5%), typical for pre-modern civilizations

Art: Patterns of Civilization chronicle art, made with AI: illustrations, not historical evidence. Entries are drafts preserved from civilization.study. Method and sources.