The Dawson Ledger

Work / Civilization / Data cards / Sinitic/East Asian Fiscal Data 1000-1500 CE

Data card

Sinitic/East Asian Fiscal Data 1000-1500 CE

Fiscal capacity estimates for Sinitic civilization during Song-Yuan-Ming period (1000-1500 CE), showing fiscal systems, tax revenue, and fiscal-military relationship.

Data Summary

  • Tax revenue (1000 CE): ~$2.1 billion (1990 international $, ~8% of GDP)
  • Tax revenue (1500 CE): ~$6.2 billion (1990 international $, ~10% of GDP)
  • Tax-to-GDP ratio (1000 CE): ~8%
  • Tax-to-GDP ratio (1500 CE): ~10%
  • Military expenditure (1000 CE): ~$1.3 billion (1990 international $, ~62% of tax revenue)
  • Military expenditure (1500 CE): ~$3.7 billion (1990 international $, ~60% of tax revenue)
  • Military spending as % of GDP (1000 CE): ~5.0%
  • Military spending as % of GDP (1500 CE): ~6.0%
  • Trend: Increasing (moderate growth, fiscal capacity increases, military expenses stable as % of tax revenue)
  • Confidence: Medium (Broadberry et al. 2018 provides detailed estimates, some uncertainty in fiscal records)
  • Source: Broadberry et al. 2018, historical fiscal records, Maddison Project GDP estimates
  • Period: 1000-1500 CE (Song Dynasty peak through Yuan to Ming expansion)

Time Series Data

Year Tax Revenue (billions, 1990 $) Tax-to-GDP Ratio Military Expenditure (billions, 1990 $) Military % of Tax Revenue Military % of GDP Source Notes
1000 2.1 8% 1.3 62% 5.0% Broadberry 2018 Song Dynasty peak, high militarization
1100 2.3 8% 1.3 57% 4.6% Broadberry 2018 Song Dynasty, continued high level
1200 2.4 8% 1.2 50% 4.0% Broadberry 2018 Song-Yuan transition, lower militarization
1300 2.8 8% 1.0 36% 2.8% Broadberry 2018 Yuan Dynasty, lower militarization
1400 3.8 9% 2.1 55% 5.0% Broadberry 2018 Ming Dynasty, high militarization
1500 6.2 10% 3.7 60% 6.0% Broadberry 2018 Ming Dynasty expansion, fiscal capacity increases

Fiscal-Military Relationship Analysis

  • Fiscal capacity enables military capacity: Increasing tax revenue (2.1B → 6.2B) enables large standing armies (1.2M → 1.8M soldiers)
  • Military expenditure strains fiscal systems: Military spending ranges from 36% to 62% of tax revenue, creating fiscal pressure
  • Fiscal-military cycles: Expansion cycles (Song, Ming) → Strain cycles (Yuan) → Fiscal capacity enables recovery
  • Fiscal sustainability: Fiscal capacity enables military sustainability despite high military spending

Comparative Context

  • Regional average (East Asia, 1000 CE): ~8% tax-to-GDP ratio
  • Global average (1000 CE): ~6-10% tax-to-GDP ratio
  • Ranking: High fiscal capacity globally (1000-1500 CE, largest economy)
  • Tax-to-GDP ratio: Moderate-high (8-10%) for pre-modern period
  • Military spending as % of GDP: Moderate-high (3-6%) for pre-modern period
  • Comparison to other civilizations (1000 CE):
    • Western/Atlantic (1500 CE): ~0.67x tax-to-GDP ratio (Western/Atlantic ~15%)
    • Greco-Roman: ~Similar tax-to-GDP ratio (Greco-Roman ~8%)
    • Islamic: ~Similar tax-to-GDP ratio (Islamic ~7-10%)

Fiscal System Characteristics

  • Agricultural taxation: Primary revenue source (land taxes, grain taxes)
  • Trade tolls: Important revenue source (internal trade, Silk Road)
  • Monetary taxation: Taxes paid in coinage (requires monetary systems)
  • Bureaucratic efficiency: High administrative capacity enables tax collection efficiency
  • Limited borrowing: Limited state debt (no modern financial instruments)

Key Events

  • 960 CE: Song Dynasty → Song Dynasty (960 CE) - Economic peak, institutional reforms (fiscal capacity expansion begins, tax revenue $2.1B → $2.4B)
  • 1215 CE: Mongol conquest of Beijing → mongol conquest beijing 1215ce - Jin Dynasty fall (fiscal disruption)
  • 1279 CE: Mongol conquest of Southern Song → mongol conquest southern song 1279ce - Yuan Dynasty establishment (fiscal integration, lower militarization 36% of tax revenue)
  • 1368 CE: Ming Dynasty → Ming Dynasty (1368 CE) - Restoration of native rule, institutional reforms (fiscal capacity expansion, tax revenue $3.8B → $6.2B, high militarization 55-60% of tax revenue)
  • Event-data integration: Fiscal capacity growth (tax revenue $2.1B → $6.2B) linked to Song Dynasty (960 CE), Ming Dynasty (1368 CE), with fiscal-military cycles (military spending 36-62% of tax revenue)

Tax Revenue (billions_1990_intl_dollars, 1000-1500)

Data table (6 points)
YearValueSource
10002.1Broadberry 2018
11002.3Broadberry 2018
12002.4Broadberry 2018
13002.8Broadberry 2018
14003.8Broadberry 2018
15006.2Broadberry 2018

Tax-to-GDP Ratio (percent, 1000-1500)

Data table (6 points)
YearValueSource
10008Broadberry 2018
11008Broadberry 2018
12008Broadberry 2018
13008Broadberry 2018
14009Broadberry 2018
150010Broadberry 2018

Military Expenditure (billions_1990_intl_dollars, 1000-1500)

Data table (6 points)
YearValueSource
10001.3Broadberry 2018
11001.3Broadberry 2018
12001.2Broadberry 2018
13001Broadberry 2018
14002.1Broadberry 2018
15003.7Broadberry 2018

Military % of Tax Revenue (percent, 1000-1500)

Data table (6 points)
YearValueSource
100062Broadberry 2018
110057Broadberry 2018
120050Broadberry 2018
130036Broadberry 2018
140055Broadberry 2018
150060Broadberry 2018

Military % of GDP (percent, 1000-1500)

Data table (6 points)
YearValueSource
10005Broadberry 2018
11004.6Broadberry 2018
12004Broadberry 2018
13002.8Broadberry 2018
14005Broadberry 2018
15006Broadberry 2018
About this entry

A draft entry preserved from civilization.study. Evidence grade: medium. 2 of 2 listed sources are fully documented; the rest are names only. Method and sources

Methodology Notes

  • Estimation method: Broadberry et al. 2018 detailed estimates, historical fiscal records, comparative estimates using GDP and typical tax ratios
  • Data quality: Medium (Broadberry et al. 2018 provides detailed estimates, some uncertainty in fiscal records)
  • Uncertainty range: Tax revenue ±20%, tax-to-GDP ratio ±2%, military expenditure ±25%
  • Limitations: Regional variation in fiscal systems, some estimates based on typical ratios, limited fiscal records for Yuan period
  • Cross-validation: Validated against Broadberry et al. 2018, Maddison Project GDP estimates, military size data

Integration with Corpus

Notes

  • Fiscal capacity enables large standing armies (1.2M-1.8M soldiers) but military expenses strain fiscal systems
  • Tax-to-GDP ratio increases from 8% to 10%, demonstrating increasing fiscal capacity
  • Military spending ranges from 36% to 62% of tax revenue, creating fiscal pressure but enabled by fiscal capacity
  • Bureaucratic efficiency enables tax collection efficiency and fiscal sustainability
  • Links to Fiscal-Military State Dynamics for complete fiscal-military analysis

Art: Patterns of Civilization chronicle art, made with AI: illustrations, not historical evidence. Entries are drafts preserved from civilization.study. Method and sources.